So I was looking through a big box of old receipts, bills and other miscellaneous paperwork and I came across a letter I’d written to a woman more than a few years ago and never sent. Actually, it was part of a series of written attempts to express my feelings, all of which I thought I’d disposed of by now. This was an early attempt and like the later ones, I never actually managed to make it say what I wanted to say. In the scheme of things, it is no great importance. We eventually came to an understanding and my suspicion that my feelings were unrequited was confirmed. Yet, when I came across the letter yesterday I was unable to toss it in the pile with years-old Panera Bread receipts and old envelopes.
I gave it a quick read and wasn’t sorry that I’d not sent
it. For one, I had later found out that when I was writing it would have been a very inopportune time to send
it. Beyond that, it seems to me now an
immature and needy piece of work. There
is too much of my own insecurity in it.
Perhaps it betrayed the rejection I’d already felt but it doesn’t convey
the feelings that were driving me crazy: the doubts and insecurities, the faint
and ultimately false hopes that she’d feel the same, and most importantly, how
crazy I was about this woman I thought I knew well enough to love.
Okay, so love is probably not the right term here. I’d say infatuation was clearly at work but
history has not shown the things for which I held the woman to high esteem to
be untrue, so there may have been some substance of love. Some
might have said that I was in love with the idea of being in love but to me
that concept seems really silly. In
reality, the letter wasn’t a love letter but more of a “I think you’re swell
and here’s some non-threatening reasons why” with some “I’d like to get to know
you better” thrown in for a rather tepid result. Mercifully, it doesn’t say “Hey, I’m stalking
you and am going to be impossible to avoid until you agree to go out with me or
take out a restraining order” but nor does it say “Hey I really dig you and your
smile makes me unable to think clearly.”
(maybe that’s creepy too?)
So, right about now if you are still reading you may be
asking where I am going with this… I actually found two letters and already
tossed the first one. It, perhaps, held
the clue as to why the letters remain long after the chance of relationship has
been long over. I made it clear in the
first attempt, which I wisely abandoned, that it was because my feelings were
driving me nuts that I felt the need to share them. In the second, more complete, letter, it isn’t
said explicitly but it is really all about me.
Knowing what I know now, I don’t think it would have mattered what I
wrote since her heart wasn’t looking for what mine wanted to offer. What does strike me though, is how unlike
love the message conveyed in the letter actually was. I have to
admit that it, like most of my awkward college infatuations were the result of
my wanting something I didn’t understand.
In some cases, I think of some of the women I’d hoped to attract and
wonder how I could have been so blind to obvious roadblocks. Time does sometimes
make us wiser and just because we love someone doesn’t mean that we are meant
to spend our lives with them. The
latter point is especially true when we love someone who doesn’t love us in the
same manner or perhaps at all.
In “Love Stinks” by the J. Geils Band, the lyrics seem to
ring true to my experience:
You love her
But she loves him
And he loves somebody else
You just can't win
And so it goes
Till the day you die
This thing they call love
It's gonna make you cry
I've had the blues
The reds and the pinks
One thing for sure
Love stinks
But she loves him
And he loves somebody else
You just can't win
And so it goes
Till the day you die
This thing they call love
It's gonna make you cry
I've had the blues
The reds and the pinks
One thing for sure
Love stinks
I can laugh at the song but when it comes to romantic love,
perhaps it resonates a bit too well with how I actually feel. After all, it is sometimes easier to joke
about things we wouldn’t admit to in a serious conversation. The song goes on to say:
Two by two and side by side
Love's gonna find you yes it is
You just can't hide
You'll hear it call
Your heart will fall
Then love will fly
It's gonna soar
I don't care for any casanova thing
All I can say is
Love stinks
Love's gonna find you yes it is
You just can't hide
You'll hear it call
Your heart will fall
Then love will fly
It's gonna soar
I don't care for any casanova thing
All I can say is
Love stinks
Even to the jaded, it seems that love is inescapable. That reality seems to be especially
frustrating for those of use who’d like to be Casanova but tend to be Charlie
Brown instead. Charlie Brown is basically a good guy but he spent all that time
interested in the little red-haired girl but never got to know her. (Disclosure: One of the first women I ever liked was a little red-haired
childhood friend of mine. She is now a red-haired woman and we long ago learned that we are much better suited as friends.) To make things more frustrating, God seems to
have played a bit of a joke on our human understanding of romantic love, Eros. To loosely paraphrase C. S. Lewis, one lover
may be in love and the other is not and then they switch roles. It is a joke at our expense and it kind of
stinks. And to think that Seth Justman
and Peter Wolf of the J. Geils Band seem to have understood it the same way!
To stop there is an injustice for if love is only what I need,
than it is far from complete. This truth
may be more eloquently expressed by the words of C. S. Lewis in The Four Loves:
“Need-love says of a woman, "I cannot live without
her"; Gift-love longs to give her happiness, comfort,
protection...appreciative love gazes and holds its breath and is silent,
rejoices that such a wonder should exist even if not for him, will not be
wholly dejected by losing her, would rather have it so than never to have seen
her at all.”
It seems to me, (and I must write seems as I am a long way
from practicing this truth) that my love life would be far more enjoyable if I
could bypass the question of whether a woman is willing or able to reciprocate
my feelings and instead be thankful for the opportunity to have known her at
all. If I look at most of my past
interests, they’ve not really progressed beyond the first state of need-love-at
least until it was clear that no hope of a relationship other than friendship
was to be had. Don’t get me wrong, most
of the time I wasn’t looking just to what I could get from the
relationship. I had the opportunity to
get to know and, in my better moments, encourage women whose hearts attracted
me and I wanted the honor of knowing more.
Unfortunately the way I eventually shared my feelings was mostly about
me; I needed to get my feelings out in the open so I wouldn’t have to analyze
them anymore and they wouldn’t drive ME crazy.
It was of little consequence until later when I sometimes realized that
my timing was hardly appropriate and my delivery could have been
better-designed so give credibility to the feelings I was struggling to
profess. After all, I chose to analyze rather than live and see where the road took me.
When I look back on them, my feelings did not get far past
my own needs I suppose. As Lewis makes
clear, love must be more than just that, indeed it must be even beyond appreciation
alone. I am not saying that we are to
put any woman we love on a pedestal to be admired but never known. I am saying that a thankful heart, enriched
by the experience of knowing others who helped bring it to life, seems a far
more appealing prospect to the selfish, me-centered heart that seems to prefer
analysis and fear to authenticity and vulnerability.